|
Sexual
Harassment
There are two forms of
sexual
harassment, (1) Quid pro quo and (2) hostile work
environment. Keep
in mind that sexual harassment is a form of
discrimination and that harassment based on "sex" is interchangeable
with all illegal forms of harassment, i.e. race, age, religion, natural
origin, etc. These claims fall under Federal Code, Title VII,
as well as individual state laws. (In New Jersey, refer to NJLAD
(New Jersey Laws
against Discrimination) laws).
Quid Pro Quo
"Quid
pro quo" in Latin
simply means, "this for that", an equal exchange. Quid
pro quo sexual harassment occurs when an employer attempts to make an
employee's submission to sexual demands a condition of his or her
employment. It involves an implicit or explicit threat that if the
employee does not accede to the sexual demands, he or she will lose his
or her job or suffer other adverse employment consequences.
The
EEOC
(Equal Employment Opportunity Center)
defines sexual
harassment as:
"Unwelcome
sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or
physical conduct of a sexual nature constitutes sexual harassment when
submission to or rejection of this conduct explicitly or implicitly
affects an individual's employment, unreasonably interferes with an
individual's work performance or creates an intimidating, hostile or
offensive work environment."
Sexual advances
do not have to be
overt, but can be subtle in nature, i.e. repeated requests for dates
that have been sternly rejected, assignments that involve working with
a supervisor who repeatedly makes unwanted advances, repeated touching,
etc.
Hostile Work
Environment
The Supreme Court
defines a hostile
work environment as when an
employer or fellow employee(s) harasses another employee because of his
or her sex rendering the working environment hostile, intimidating or
offensive. Often,
the harassing conduct takes the form of unwelcome sexual touchings and
comments. However, the harassing conduct need not be sexual in nature;
rather, the defining characteristic is that the harassment occurs
because of the victim's sex.
The
Courts have determined that there are four "prongs" (equivalent of
"elements" in criminal law) that must be met to establish a
claim for
hostile work environment sexual harassment.
The complained of conduct:
(1) would not have occurred but
for the employee's gender; and it was
(2) severe
or pervasive enough to make a
(3) reasonable
woman believe that
(4) the conditions of employment are
altered and the working environment is
hostile or abusive.
Element (1)
can be proven be merely showing that the conduct would not have
occurred
but for the complainants sex. The conduct does not have to be
sexual in nature, but can be sexist instead. (An example of
this would be denying a promotion/assignment based on the sex of the
applicant.)
Element (2) is more difficult to
prove. Typically, the Courts have held that a single incident of
harassment would not normally give rise to substantiate a
complaint. More frequently, a complainant recites a series of
events, that when taken individually may be harmless, but when viewed
together show a pattern of abuse.
This is why it is very important for women in this position to
thoroughly document events with dates and times.
Element (3) is an objective
assessment of the working conditions and environment through the eyes
of a "reasonable woman". It does not give consideration to
how the conduct affected the complainant because it takes into
consideration
that the complainant may be overly sensitive.
Therefore, the Court considers how the employer treats all females in
its employ and will accept incidents of harassment towards other female
employees as evidence to meet and satisfy this prong. It will
also accept all incidents of differential treatment towards all
minorities employed with the same employer.
The
Courts have noted
that just because a fellow employee does not complain of illegal
activity, their lack of complaint does not make the activity
legal, nor does it create an environment where fellow employees must
accept the same illegal treatment. Just as the
Court takes into consideration that one employee may be overly
sensitive, it also recognizes that another employee may be more
resilient.
Element (4) must show that the
complainant's work environment has been altered to create a
hostile work environment. This can be achieved by examining
the employee's work environment prior to the onset of the illegal
activity as compared to after. It should be noted that the
condition of the complainant's work environment only need be affected
and that monetary income need not be a consideration. Examples can
include, shift changes, changes in assignments, receiving less
favorable assignments, being repeatedly disciplined for infractions
that others are not disciplined, being denied time off, schools,
etc.
Reporting
Harassment
Along with the
responsibility of identifying harassment, the employee has the
responsibility to report it to the employer. Every
agency, by law, should have a method in place for an employer to report
acts of sexual harassment. If your agency does not have a
procedure in place, simply write a letter and present it to your
supervisor. (If you are complaining about your supervisor,
report it to their supervisor). If your employer
does not take actions to correct the situation, you will need to
contact the EEOC and seek the assistance of an employee.
Visit the Case Law Library
to read Sexual Harassment Case Law.
This
web site is designed for general information only. The information
presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal
advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.
|